Tuesday, November 22, 2011

I'm Beat

Today in English we talked about the beat poets, so I was excited of course. 'Cause I'm so interested in the beat generation, you know, and last Christmas break I had a beat phase where I read On the Road and watched a movie written and directed by Jack Kerouac called Pull My Daisy which was definitely bizarre, and might have read Howl except that I knew it was rated NC-17 as books go and thought I probably shouldn't. I still don't have a handle on it, but it does continue to intrigue me. So here is the image of the fifties that you have in your head:
And these are the words that kept coming up in our discussion of the fifties: consumerism, conformity, homogeneity. Why? Because no one wanted to end up like Julius & Ethel. If you kept your head down and were happy being a white American suburb-dweller, obviously you weren't a communist. Okay. Except this rubbed some people the wrong way, so they got drunk and did (correct verb? IDK) benzedrine and went on long road trips and wrote obscene novels and poems and were called beatniks.
There he is--Mr. Ginsberg.
But the CRAZY thing is that people still really care about those guys--about Kerouac and Ginsberg and Burroughs, etc. On the Road  was written in 1957 and remains a top-seller today. NYU professors profess that their courses on the beat generation regularly attract eight times as many students as are allowed to register. Today a really nice-looking man with 50s-Allen-Ginsberg glasses showed up to my English class even though he isn't in it just to learn more about the beats. Why?
We addressed the question in class. The conclusion was that college students like the idea of nonconformity--of establishing themselves as individuals among a crowd and of eschewing materialism. Being a beatnik is what young people really want to do. "If you had a dollar to your name," as my professor said, things would be different--and they will be different. As Winston Churchill said, "If you are not a liberal at twenty, you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at forty, you have no brain." Not saying I agree with that, but it's an interesting thought. We have lofty ideals and like the thought, at this age, of dancing to the beat of our own drummer, but will that outlook abandon us as we age? 
I have certainly felt this way about my parents. Some of the things they care so much about, like how nice our lawn looks, just feel inane to me. And often I know they are judging other people for being not like them, like a sixty year old woman with waist-length gray hair--and I think who cares? I like the idea of having unruly gray hair at whatever point in life my hair decides to turn itself gray, but I know that my mother is going to have close-cropped blonde-highlighted hair for the rest of her life; is this a phase I'm going through? Not to say I disregard the wisdom of my parents; many worse fates could befall me than turning out like them. In general I think they are wonderful, but there are a few aspects of life in which I would prefer to do things differently. Perhaps it is impossible for me to be truly materialistic now because I am not concerned with building for myself a life full of stuff, but when I have my own home, who's to say what will happen? Our dear Austin threw away all his clothes, took up his cross and followed Ralph Waldo Emerson who said that "Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist," but was that the blind idealism of youth? Or is it the blind materialism of age that clouds our vision and makes us care about things that don't matter? I can write letters to my future self to remind me not to be like everyone else, but that would be as useful as making a goal like "I'm not going to eat anymore ice cream tonight"--in ten minutes you want more ice cream and tell yourself that first goal was foolish and unrealistic. Amiright.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Remember that one time

I was at your kitchen table doing homework and I said "Oh!" and you said "What?" and I said, "Well . . . wait, I don't know, I'll tell you when I've thought about it some more"? This was it: When I have my own house I'm going to make a pillow for my couch that says this line from W.H. Auden's "As I Walked Out One Evening":

Perhaps it doesn't sound as nice out-of-context so here's the whole thing: http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15551
It will go along with all my inevitable vinyl-lettered wooden boards that say "Live Laugh Love" and "Life is about . . . learning to dance in the rain or something, etc." You know.

Monday, November 14, 2011

The Tentative Blog Presents: Historical Hunk, 1st Edition

Okay Carla, if you're not even going to accept my invitation to author this blog I'm going to go ahead and make my first official post without your acknowledgment. HISTORICAL HUNK. I know how we both appreciate those. A few days ago in a slideshow on modernist manifestos, I caught a glimpse of this face:
EZRA POUND. Definitely looks like the most pompous man who ever penned a poem, but also one of the prettiest. I think he might even come in ahead of Lord Byron. Perhaps you have heard his most famous poem, "In A Station of the Metro"--look, I already have it memorized.
The apparition of these faces in the crowd
Petals on a wet black bough. 
Basically, he wasn't as laudable a poet as some others on his scene, but he did hang out with T.S. Eliot and Ernest Hemingway and James Joyce and Robert Frost, and told them all what to do, which I'd wager makes him COOL. Plus he was born in Idaho, so that's . . . something. Said Hemingway of Pound in 1925: "He defends [his friends] when they are attacked, he gets them into magazines and out of jail. He loans them money. ... He writes articles about them. He introduces them to wealthy women. He gets publishers to take their books. He sits up all night with them when they claim to be dying . . . he advances them hospital expenses and dissuades them from suicide." Great friend and great facial hair. Mmhmm.

AM

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Dear Carla,

I am terribly sorry, but a technical difficulty necessitated the deletion of our previous blog. This is a new one, with the same title, which needs to be changed. Due to the impressive knowledge I now possess on a wide range of aesthetic movements from romanticism to realism to naturalism to modernism, I feel the need to outline the aesthetic creed of this blog.

A true blog post is awe-inspiring or at least thought-provoking. A post should involve something you or I care about. A post should be something I/you want to share with you/me but won't necessarily just bring up, either because there would be no reason or because I will forget. A post may be a momentary epiphany or an conclusion drawn after a long thought. A post needs no introduction and no interpretation, though it may be supplied. Taken together, this blog will be the contents of our mind if we had one mind and it was made of the smartest, most introspective half of each of us.

You may outline some tenets of your own.

AM